When awarding debts, you should remember that you cannot legally allocate a portion of a debt – any attempt to do so becomes a fair assignment. The main practical difference between a legal assignment and an assignment of the right of convenience is that the assignor must be bound in all legal proceedings relating to the assigned debt (e.g. B to attempt to recover this part of the debt). Back to the law, we were thirsty for a new law for black letters. Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925. It defines the conditions that must be met for an effective legal assignment of an elected remedy (e.g. B of a debt). We won`t bore you with the details, but suffice it to say that it is important that a legal assignment is written and signed by the singer, that it is absolute (which is not a condition) and that it is essential that the assignment is notified in writing to the debtor. The debt allocation process has been the subject of much criticism, especially in recent decades. Debt buyers have been accused of participating in all sorts of unethical practices to get paid, including regular threats and harassment against debtors. In some cases, they have also been tasked with chasing away debts that have already been repaid. This document is extremely short and developed.
It contains only the identities of the parties, the terms of the debt, the amount of the debt and the signatures. It is automatically fulfilled with certain important contractual conditions to make it a complete agreement. There are several reasons why a creditor may decide to assign their debt to someone else. This option is often used to improve liquidity and/or reduce risk. A lender may need a quick injection of capital. Alternatively, it might have accumulated many high-risk loans and be cautious about the fact that many of them could break down. In such cases, creditors may be ready to get rid of them quickly for cents on the dollar, if that means improving their financial prospects and appeasing worried investors. In other times, the creditor may decide that the debt is too old to waste its resources on collection, or to sell or assign them to a third party to absorb the collection activity.
. . .